48 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
# Epic: Deposit Form & Payment Integration - Brownfield Enhancement
|
|
|
|
## Epic Goal
|
|
Complete the deposit form functionality and integrate secure payment processing to enable online deposits for tattoo appointments, improving customer convenience and reducing manual payment handling.
|
|
|
|
## Epic Description
|
|
|
|
**Existing System Context:**
|
|
- Current booking system with deposit requirements
|
|
- Existing user authentication and appointment management
|
|
- Technology stack: Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS
|
|
- Mobile-first user base (70% of bookings from mobile devices)
|
|
|
|
**Enhancement Details:**
|
|
- Implement complete deposit form with client-side validation and error handling
|
|
- Integrate Stripe payment processing using Embedded Elements for optimal UX and PCI compliance
|
|
- Use inline payment form within booking flow to reduce abandonment
|
|
- Implement immediate retry for transient payment failures with fallback to manual processing
|
|
- Connect payment success to booking confirmation and email notifications
|
|
- Add admin dashboard for payment tracking, reporting, and manual intervention
|
|
- Store only payment reference IDs and status (no sensitive card data)
|
|
- Success criteria: Reduce deposit processing time from 48hrs to <5min, achieve 95% payment success rate, process 80% of deposits online
|
|
|
|
## Stories
|
|
|
|
1. **Story 1:** Complete deposit form UI with validation and error handling
|
|
2. **Story 2:** Integrate payment gateway API and handle payment processing
|
|
3. **Story 3:** Connect payment success to booking confirmation and email notifications
|
|
4. **Story 4:** Add admin payment tracking dashboard and reporting
|
|
|
|
## Compatibility Requirements
|
|
- [ ] Existing booking APIs remain unchanged
|
|
- [ ] User authentication system integrates seamlessly
|
|
- [ ] Database schema changes are backward compatible
|
|
- [ ] UI follows existing design patterns
|
|
- [ ] Performance impact is minimal (<200ms response time)
|
|
|
|
## Risk Mitigation
|
|
- **Primary Risk:** Payment security and PCI compliance
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Use certified payment gateway, no sensitive data storage
|
|
- **Rollback Plan:** Disable payment button, revert to manual deposit handling
|
|
|
|
## Definition of Done
|
|
- [ ] All stories completed with acceptance criteria met
|
|
- [ ] Existing functionality verified through testing
|
|
- [ ] Payment integration points working correctly
|
|
- [ ] Security and compliance requirements met
|
|
- [ ] No regression in existing booking features |