Nicholai/united-tattoo
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 24 Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
united-tattoo/docs/qa/po-master-checklist-validation-report-2025-09-18.md

12 KiB
Raw Blame History

PO Master Checklist Validation Report

Project: United Tattoo
Checklist: .bmad-core/checklists/po-master-checklist.md
Mode: Comprehensive (YOLO)
Date: 2025-09-18 17:31 MT

Reviewed Artifacts (evidence):

  • PRD Index: docs/prd/index.md
  • Epics: docs/prd/epics.md
  • Brownfield Rollback Strategy: docs/prd/rollback-strategy.md
  • Package manifest/scripts: package.json
  • Repository structure (Next.js App Router, app/, components/, sql/schema.sql, wrangler.toml present)
  • Not exhaustively reviewed in this pass: detailed brownfield architecture docs referenced by rollback strategy

Project Type Determination:

  • Type: Brownfield
  • UI/UX: Yes (public-facing site + admin + booking)
  • Sections skipped due to type: All [GREENFIELD ONLY] items

Executive Summary

  • Project type: Brownfield with UI
  • Overall readiness: 78% (est.)
  • Recommendation: CONDITIONAL (proceed with targeted pre-dev fixes)
  • Critical blocking issues: 3
  • Sections skipped due to project type: 1.1 Project Scaffolding [GREENFIELD ONLY], some GREENFIELD-only checks across sections

Top Signals:

  • Strong foundation: PRD structure, epics, working Next + OpenNext + Cloudflare Pages flow, D1 in place, tests infra present (Vitest/RTL), comprehensive rollback strategy authored
  • Gaps to close: feature flags not wired in code, migration “down” strategy + structure, CI/CD pipeline not committed, observability not implemented

Pass Rates by Section

  1. Project Setup & Initialization: 85%
  2. Infrastructure & Deployment: 70%
  3. External Dependencies & Integrations: 75%
  4. UI/UX Considerations: 70%
  5. User/Agent Responsibility: 60%
  6. Feature Sequencing & Dependencies: 80%
  7. Risk Management (Brownfield): 90%
  8. MVP Scope Alignment: 80%
  9. Documentation & Handoff: 75%
  10. Post-MVP Considerations: 70%

Overall: 78%

Method: Items marked as PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL/N/A; PASS rate computed per section; estimates grounded in listed evidence and repo state.

Detailed Findings

1. Project Setup & Initialization

Status: PASS (85%)

  • 1.3 Development Environment — PASS
    • next dev/build/start present; Tailwind configured; app router present
  • 1.4 Core Dependencies — PARTIAL
    • Versions pinned adequately; conflicts not detected; brownfield compatibility partially validated in practice
  • 1.2 Existing System Integration [BROWNFIELD] — PARTIAL
    • Local testing approach exists (vitest), but explicit regression guardrails/process not fully documented for brownfield deltas

Actions:

  • Add a “Local Dev Setup” section to README with explicit tool versions and smoke checklist
  • Document brownfield regression plan at story or epic level (link to tests approach)

2. Infrastructure & Deployment

Status: PARTIAL (70%)

  • 2.3 Deployment Pipeline — PARTIAL
    • OpenNext build + wrangler deploy scripts present; CI/CD pipeline file not committed
  • 2.1 Database & Data Store Setup — PARTIAL
    • D1 used with sql/schema.sql; no migrations directory or down scripts implemented
  • 2.4 Testing Infrastructure — PASS/PARTIAL
    • Vitest + RTL configured; component/E2E (Playwright) not present in repo

Actions:

  • Commit CI pipeline (lint, typecheck, test, build, preview deploy); enforce budgets
  • Introduce sql/migrations/{timestamp}_up.sql and corresponding _down.sql; add npm scripts
  • Add Playwright for E2E critical flows (admin auth, booking form happy-path, public pages)

3. External Dependencies & Integrations

Status: PARTIAL (75%)

  • Third-party services/API keys — PARTIAL
    • Env validation via lib/env.ts exists; secrets via wrangler; explicit storage/rotation guidance not fully documented
  • External APIs — N/A or PASS (current scope primarily internal)

Actions:

  • Expand env/secret handling doc: wrangler secrets put process + required vars matrix for preview/prod

4. UI/UX Considerations [UI/UX ONLY]

Status: PARTIAL (70%)

  • Design system setup — PASS/PARTIAL
    • Tailwind, shadcn/ui patterns present; accessibility policy not fully documented
  • Frontend infra — PASS
    • App Router, build pipeline OK
  • UX flow/error/loading patterns — PARTIAL
    • Core flows present; global a11y/error/loading standards doc not found

Actions:

  • Add a11y acceptance checklist; standardize error/loading skeletons; document form validation patterns (Zod + RHF) app-wide

5. User/Agent Responsibility

Status: PARTIAL (60%)

  • Responsibilities delineation — PARTIAL
    • BMAD personas exist; explicit “who does what” for external accounts/payment credentials not clearly captured in PRD

Actions:

  • Add a PRD “Responsibilities” section (user vs agents), especially for accounts, payments, long-lived creds

6. Feature Sequencing & Dependencies

Status: PASS (80%)

  • Functional/technical dependency sequencing — PASS
    • Epics articulate sequencing; stories exist for feature flags
  • Cross-epic dependencies — PARTIAL
    • Good linkage; ensure early infra tasks (flags/migrations/observability) precede feature toggling

Actions:

  • Ensure flags and migration framework tasks are scheduled before dependent stories

7. Risk Management [BROWNFIELD ONLY]

Status: STRONG PASS (90%)

  • Rollback strategy — PASS
    • docs/prd/rollback-strategy.md comprehensive; explicit flags, triggers, runbooks
  • DB/R2 rollback — PARTIAL
    • Plan documented; “down” migrations and backup scripts not yet implemented

Actions:

  • Implement flags wiring; add db:backup script; create initial down migrations

8. MVP Scope Alignment

Status: PASS (80%)

  • Core goals alignment — PASS
  • User journeys completeness — PARTIAL
    • Booking/admin/public happy-paths defined; edge/error states captured but require a11y/error docs
  • Technical requirements — PARTIAL
    • Performance/observability not yet wired

Actions:

  • Add observability + performance budgets; define a11y minimums

9. Documentation & Handoff

Status: PARTIAL (75%)

  • Dev docs (API/setup/decisions) — PARTIAL
    • Good architecture/PRD; API route docs limited; ADRs not formalized
  • User docs — PARTIAL
    • Public banners/communications outlined in rollback doc; UX specs can be expanded

Actions:

  • Add lightweight ADRs for key decisions; document API route contracts (request/response, headers, caching)

10. Post-MVP Considerations

Status: PARTIAL (70%)

  • Future enhancements separation — PASS
  • Monitoring & feedback — PARTIAL
    • Sentry/OTel not implemented; thresholds defined but not instrumented

Actions:

  • Add Sentry + basic OTel; wire minimal metrics (route latencies, 5xx counts)

Failed/Partial Items (Selected) with Context

  • Feature flags not yet wired in code (FAIL)
    • Evidence: Rollback doc Appendix A notes flags wiring “not yet implemented”
  • No down migrations or structured migrations dir (FAIL)
    • Evidence: Only sql/schema.sql found; no sql/migrations/ with up/down pairs
  • CI/CD pipeline not committed (FAIL)
    • Evidence: No workflows or CI config in repo; scripts exist but automation missing
  • Observability not implemented (PARTIAL/FAIL)
    • Evidence: No Sentry/OTel deps or init code present
  • a11y/error/loading standards not documented (PARTIAL)
    • Evidence: No explicit doc; components exist but standards undefined

Brownfield-Specific Analysis

  • Integration risk level: Medium
    • Mitigations: Strong rollback plan, but lack of wired flags and down migrations increases operational risk
  • Existing system impact assessment: Good coverage via rollback doc; verify admin and booking critical paths with E2E
  • Rollback readiness: Conceptually strong; needs code + scripts to operationalize
  • User disruption potential: Medium; mitigated by feature flags once implemented

Risk Assessment

Top 5 Risks

  1. Missing feature flag wiring delays safe rollout and reversibility (Impact: High, Prob: Med)
  2. Lack of down migrations increases DB recovery time (High, Med)
  3. No CI/CD pipeline risks regressions slipping to prod (High, Med)
  4. Missing observability reduces detection speed for incidents (High, Med)
  5. a11y/error/loading consistency gaps hurt UX and recovery UX (Med, Med)

Mitigations

  • Implement flags + toggles first; build small demo wiring across admin/booking/public
  • Establish migration framework with initial up/down; add db:backup script
  • Commit CI with lint, typecheck, test, build, preview deploy; enforce budgets
  • Add Sentry + minimal OTel; instrument critical routes
  • Document a11y/error/loading patterns; add automated a11y checks

Timeline impact: 2–4 dev days to reach green on critical items (flags+migrations+CI), 1–2 days for observability and UX standards

MVP Completeness

  • Core features coverage: Solid foundation per Epics
  • Missing essentials: Flags wiring, down migrations, CI pipeline, observability
  • Scope creep: None apparent; strong alignment with business goals

Implementation Readiness

  • Developer clarity score: 8/10
  • Ambiguous requirements: Low; primarily operationalization gaps
  • Missing technical details: Migration down scripts, CI config, observability setup
  • Integration point clarity (brownfield): Good in rollback doc; needs E2E to lock confidence

Recommendations

Must-fix before development

  1. Wire feature flags across admin, booking, public (server + client usage)
  2. Introduce sql/migrations with up/down; add npm run db:backup and dry-run on preview
  3. Commit CI pipeline (lint/type/test/build/preview deploy) with budgets

Should-fix for quality 4) Add Sentry + minimum route metrics; alert thresholds matching rollback triggers 5) Add Playwright E2E for admin auth, booking submit, key public pages

Consider for improvement 6) API route docs with request/response schemas; add ADRs 7) a11y/error/loading standards doc + automated a11y checks

Post-MVP deferrals 8) Advanced analytics/feedback loops; KV-based instant flags

Brownfield Integration Confidence

  • Preserve existing functionality: Medium → High after flags + E2E
  • Rollback procedure completeness: Conceptually High; implementation Medium (needs flags, downs, scripts)
  • Monitoring coverage for integration points: Low → Medium after Sentry/metrics
  • Support team readiness: Moderate; comms templates exist

Category Statuses

Category Status Critical Issues
1. Project Setup & Initialization PASS
2. Infrastructure & Deployment PARTIAL CI, migrations
3. External Dependencies & Integrations PARTIAL Secrets docs
4. UI/UX Considerations PARTIAL a11y/error docs
5. User/Agent Responsibility PARTIAL Ownership doc
6. Feature Sequencing & Dependencies PASS
7. Risk Management (Brownfield) PASS Downs missing
8. MVP Scope Alignment PASS
9. Documentation & Handoff PARTIAL API/ADRs
10. Post-MVP Considerations PARTIAL Observability

Final Decision

CONDITIONAL — Proceed after completing the Must-fix items:

  • Feature flag wiring in code
  • Migrations framework with down scripts + backup script
  • CI pipeline committed and enforced

Once completed, readiness expected to exceed 90% with improved integration confidence.

Appendix — Immediate Task Suggestions (Ticket Seeds)

  • chore(flags): add lib/flags.ts; wire ADMIN_ENABLED, BOOKING_ENABLED, PUBLIC_DB_ARTISTS_ENABLED across surfaces
  • chore(db): add sql/migrations/ with initial up/down from schema.sql; add npm scripts db:migrate:up/down, db:backup
  • ci: add workflow with lint/type/test/build/preview; enforce bundle budgets
  • feat(obs): add Sentry init; instrument critical routes; basic OTel traces
  • test(e2e): add Playwright; scripts; minimal smoke flows (admin, booking, public)
  • docs: a11y/error/loading standards; API route contracts; ownership/responsibilities; ADR template